10 NOV. 2026 / DUBAI . UAE


COMMITTMENT
to EXCELLENCE

Judging Process


The MEED Projects Awards 2026 in association with Mashreq judging process is a multi-tiered, objective evaluation led by an independent panel of industry experts to ensure integrity and regional representation.

 

Independent experts:


Entries are reviewed by a panel of more than 50 industry specialists and subject-matter experts representing diverse professional roles

Regional representation:


The panel typically includes senior figures from engineering societies across the MENA region

Conflict of interest:


 Judges are required to recuse themselves from evaluating any entries where a potential conflict of interest exists

Strict confidentiality:


All submission data is kept confidential between the entrant and the judges.

Final decision:


 The judges' decision is final. No feedback is provided to unsuccessful entrants, and no correspondence regarding the results is entered into after the announcement.

Meet Our Judges


BIM Expert
Dubai Municipality
Vice President
Khatib & Alami
Advisor - Planning, Governance and Investments Sector
Abu Dhabi Projects and Infrastructure Center (ADPIC)
Engineering Digital Transformation Expert
Dubai Municipality

Evaluation Phases

National Winner selection: The MEED process first assesses entries against the fellow projects in their respective countries based on local impact and excellence.
MENA Winner selection: These national winners are then benchmarked against one another by the judges to determine the ultimate winner in each category.

Key Judging Criteria

In the judging process, the judges score projects based on four core criteria:

Engineering & Design

Judges look for technical mastery that goes beyond standard industry benchmarks to solve complex challenges. This could include: 


Problem solving: 
Evidence of innovative engineering solutions used to overcome specific site, structural or logistical constraints


Design: 
Evidence of effective integration of the integration of form and function, the blending of projects with their setting and surroundings, etc.


Technical excellence:
High-quality civil engineering, structural integrity, and architectural design that reflects the project’s purpose


Technological Innovation

This criterion focuses on how the project team integrated cutting-edge tools or pioneered new methods. This could include:   


Digitalisation:
Implementation of advanced construction technologies and tool suites – from BIM systems to AI analysis – to improve efficiency


New methodologies:
Use of groundbreaking construction techniques or materials that have not been widely used in the region before


Creative adaptation:
Use of existing technologies or techniques in innovative ways to deliver enhanced efficiencies or superior final products

Project Management & Delivery

This assessment covers the execution phase, focusing on how the team collaborated to deliver a quality asset. This could include: 


Adherence to constraints: 
Clear evidence of meeting strict budgets and timelines while maintaining high quality   


Health & safety: 
Demonstration of a healthy and safe working environment throughout the project lifecycle   


Stakeholder collaboration:
Integration of the supply chain and effective communication between the client, consultants, and contractors


Project Impact & Sustainability

Judges weigh the long-term legacy of the project on the environment and society. This could include: 


Environmental responsibility: 
Efficiency of power and water systems, waste management and overall footprint, and green building certification efforts   


Economic & social results:
Tangible contributions to job creation and long-term economic and societal benefits (in whatever form) for the local community